Focused on Resolution. Proven in Court. Trusted by Clients.

“I knew the judge was not going to favor my client, so I successfully negotiated a settlement that was much better than anything that judge was going to award.”

“When faced with a case where one of the children was autistic in which the parents were so angry with each other that it was having a negative effect on both children, especially the one who was autistic. I successfully negotiated an agreement that included a provision that the parents would work with a therapist skilled in dealing with high conflict divorce. After working with that therapist, they were able to put aside their differences in order to shield the children from their anger. The result was that the parents ultimately became friends and were able to successfully co-parent both their children, including their autistic child.”

“Sex Addict in recovery rebuilds the relationship with his daughter after years of abandonment in favor of his addiction by showing that a recovered addict can be a father is every sense of that word. By creating a possession schedule that emphasizes transparency thereby giving the mother assurance that her child was not put in harms way by the addict “acting out” in his addiction. The nature of addiction is that it demands everything of the addict. It comes first. Chris Spofford set up a plan that puts the child first, not the addiction. This benefited the entire family.” 

“An alcoholic that finally faced with the impending loss of the relationship with her children by limiting her to supervised visits. Chris was able to reach that mother and create a plan for her recovery with built-in metrics assuring the father of her continued sobriety. Now sober many years, she has a true co-parenting relationship with her former husband and a possession schedule that provides for equal unfettered time with her children.”

“Securing a favorable property settlement for a woman whose husband continued to deny his alcoholism by proving the fact of his addiction and the harm done to his wife by his addiction and the extent to which the community estate was damaged by an addiction that he refused to face.”